All Floras      Advanced Search
FNA Vol. 12 Login | eFloras Home | Help
FNA | Family List | FNA Vol. 12 | Vitaceae

10. Vitis riparia Michaux, Fl. Bor.-Amer. 2: 231. 1803.

Riverbank or frost grape, vigne de rivages Riverbank or frost grape, vigne de rivages

Vitis cordifolia Michaux var. riparia (Michaux) A. Gray; V. riparia var. syrticola (Fernald & Wiegand) Fernald; V. vulpina Linnaeus subsp. riparia (Michaux) R. T. Clausen; V. vulpina var. syrticola Fernald & Wiegand

Plants usually moderate to high climbing, sometimes sprawling, sparsely branched. Branches: bark exfoliating in shreds; nodal diaphragms to 0.5 mm thick; branchlets terete, glabrous or sparsely hirtellous, growing tips enveloped by unfolding leaves, glabrous or sparsely hairy; tendrils along length of branchlets, persistent, branched, tendrils (or inflorescences) at only 2 consecutive nodes; nodes not red-banded. Leaves: stipules 3–5 mm; petiole 1/2 to ± equaling blade; blade cordate, 6–20 cm, 3-shouldered to shallowly 3-lobed, apex short acuminate, abaxial surface not glaucous, glabrate, visible through hairs, veins and vein axils hirtellous, adaxial surface glabrous. Inflorescences (4–)9–12 cm. Flowers functionally unisexual. Berries black, heavily glaucous, globose, 8–12 mm diam., skin separating from pulp; lenticels absent. 2n = 38.

Flowering Apr–Jun; fruiting Aug–Sep. Stream and riverbanks, pond margins, alluvial woodlands, ravines, thickets, roadsides, fencerows; 0–2200 m; Man., N.B., N.S., Ont., Que., Sask.; Ala., Ark., Colo., Conn., D.C., Ill., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Maine, Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., N.H., N.J., N.Mex., N.Y., N.C., N.Dak., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., R.I., S.Dak., Tenn., Tex., Vt., Va., Wash., W.Va., Wis., Wyo.

Vitis riparia is native throughout much of its range. It has become naturalized in a few locations in Saskatchewan, Oregon, and Washington. Plants on dunes around the Great Lakes with hairier petioles and leaf blades sometimes have been recognized as var. syrticola; variation in hairiness is essentially continuous, however, and the form is not worthy of taxonomic recognition (P. M. Catling and G. Mitrow 2005).


Related Objects  
  • Distribution Map
  • Map

     |  eFlora Home |  People Search  |  Help  |  ActKey  |  Hu Cards  |  Glossary  |