23. Cardamine maxima (Nuttall) Alph. Wood, Amer. Bot. Fl. 38. 1870.
Dentaria maxima Nuttall, Gen. N. Amer. Pl. 2: 66. 1818; Cardamine anomala (Eames) K. Schumann; D. anomala Eames
Perennials; glabrous (except leaflet margins and, sometimes, rachis). Rhizomes cylindrical, 3-6 mm diam., (distinctly constricted at intervals, non-uniform diam., fleshy, slightly fragile, with dentate leaf scars). Stems erect, unbranched, 0.9-3(-4) dm. Rhizomal leaves 3-foliolate, 7-20 cm, leaflets petiolulate or subsessile; petiole 4-15 cm; lateral leaflets subsessile or petiolulate, blade often similar to terminal, base often oblique; terminal leaflet (petiolule 0.2-1(-1.7) cm), blade broadly ovate to oblong, 2-7.5 cm × 12-37 mm, base cuneate to obtuse, margins coarsely dentate to sharply incised, or deeply cleft into 2 or 3 lobes (lobes dentate or incised, margins puberulent). Cauline leaves 2 or 3, 3-foliolate, (rarely subopposite), petiolate, leaflets petiolulate or subsessile; petiole (0.5-)1-4(-6.5) cm, base not auriculate; lateral and terminal leaflets similar to rhizomal, distalmost sometimes much smaller. Racemes ebracteate. Fruiting pedicels: (flowering ones) horizontal to divaricate or deflexed, 7-20 mm. Flowers: sepals (erect to ascending), oblong, 5-7 × 2-3 mm, lateral pair slightly saccate basally; petals white or pink, oblanceolate, 10-17 × 3-6 mm, (not clawed, apex rounded); filaments: median pairs 4-8 mm, lateral pair 3-6.5 mm; anthers linear, 1.7-2.7 mm. Fruits (undeveloped), linear-lanceolate, to 3 cm × 2 mm; ovules 10-14 per ovary; style 3.5-7 mm. Seeds not known. 2n = 120, 124, 132, 138, 156, 161, ca. 208.
Flowering Apr-Jun. Rich woods, shady ravines, ledges, moist alluvial bottoms, steep forested slopes, stream banks; N.B., Ont., Que.; Conn., Maine, Mass., Mich., N.J., N.Y., Ohio, Pa., Vt.
Cardamine maxima has not been found with mature fruits and seeds and it has long been suspected to be a hybrid between C. concatenata and C. diphylla. Molecular studies (P. W. Sweeney and R. A. Price 2000) indicate that C. maxima is distinct from both those species. Although we hesitate to maintain it as a species, its wide distribution and morphological distinctness warrant its recognition.